A Conservative’s View of the World from the Heartland

Gribbit’s Word


1280 x 1024 screen resolution STRONGLY recommended


April 10th, 2008 at 6:17 am

Liberal Contradictions About Iraqi Oil and the War

in: Global War on Terrorism, Libtards on Parade, Lunatic Lefties, News, Opinion, Stupidity, The Do-Nothing Congress, World Events

I find it incredibly ironic that those who first began to oppose the “War in Iraq” did so on the basis of “No Blood for Oil” as if we would be pillaging Iraq’s oil as we conquered their country. These same libtarded members of Congress are now advocating that Iraq tap into their oil surplus to rebuild their own country. Who buys this oil? The United States of course.

The anti-war slogan “No Blood for Oil” made it seem like we would be willing to trade American, or worse yet to the libtards – Iraqi, blood for plundered oil. Remember the protests? We were only going to war with Iraq to steal their oil. Not to rid the world of a dictator who has openly boasted about his willingness to use chemical weapons against his own people let alone a sworn enemy. Not to rid the world of a dictator suspected of attempting to acquire nuclear materials and weapons. Not to rid the world of a dictator who was willing to allow his own people to starve as he collected millions of dollars through a loophole in the UN’s “Oil for Food” program and used the money to build more extravagant palaces and acquire weapons to re-arm his army. Oh no, the US wasn’t waging war against a war-lord who gained his political position through assassination and maintained it through more assassinations.

The libtarded Bush Derangement Syndrome mantra about the war is “Bush lied, people died” implying that President Bush knew before the invasion of Iraq that they had no Weapons of Mass Destruction. This is a sentiment that has never been proven. If President Bush honestly believed that those weapons did exist, as Saddam Hussein (remember that name) led the rest of the world believe, then he didn’t lie about anything.

The truth my friends is that the war was fought to keep weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of radical Islamic Terrorists. The world believed that Iraq had them because Hussein led the world to believe that he had them. We believed him when he said that he had them and it got him hung.

So now the left wants to dictate to Iraq that they use their oil revenues to rebuild their nation. That was the plan from the beginning. We still heard the cries of “No Blood for Oil”.

Bookmark and Share
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Reddit] [Sphere] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Email] More »

Glenn McCoy Questions Dem Contradiction linked with Glenn McCoy Questions Dem Contradiction


1

 

RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI





In submitting a comment, the commenter acknowledges that they will conform to all the rules set forth in the Comment Policy.

John Kasich for Governor


Sign up for Updates | Donate Today




    Image Courtesy of Young Gun Conservative


    Check Out the Young Gun Conservative Radio Show





    And Please Tell Her I Said So!
    I do wish you would.












    Blog directory


    Complaint Department


    admin[at]gribbitonline[dot]com


    - Warning -
    There is no guarantee it will actually be read.


    Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

    SaveNetRadio.org

    Google Groups
    Conservative Post Pimp
    Visit this group


    Report Suspicious Activity:
    1-866-DHS-2-ICE
    1-866-347-2423


    The Common Democrat


    Add to Technorati Favorites








    Img Courtesy of Big Dog









    Conservatism: 1) capitalized a: the principles and policies of a Conservative party b: the Conservative party.
    2) a: disposition in politics to preserve what is established b: a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change; specifically : such a philosophy calling for lower taxes, limited government regulation of business and investing, a strong national defense, and individual financial responsibility for personal needs (as retirement income or health-care coverage).
    3): the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to change. - Merriam Webster Online



"In the spirit of reaching across the aisle, we owe it to the Democrats to show their president the exact same kind of respect and loyalty that they have shown our recent Republican president." - Ann Coulter