I took some time in the wee hours of the morning yesterday and thought about how the American liberal must live under the constant stress of hypocrisy. It is no wonder liberals are as uptight as they are. Think about it for just a moment and you’ll see where I’m coming from.
Evolution vs. Social Programs
How can modern liberals advocate the teaching of the theory of evolution as science fact when they actively attempt to thwart nature’s plan by artificially propping up those who are weak? If Darwin taught that survival of the fittest was natures way of evolving, why is it that liberals of this nation would have you believe that we have a moral obligation to provide for the poor through an over burdensome tax system by which the government of the United States plays Robin Hood? Those with the Robin Hood complex confuse this nation’s guarantee of equal opportunity with equal outcome. This is contrary to the laws of nature which state that the strongest species survive and the weaker ones die off. This must be a source of confusion for the modern day American liberal.
Evolution vs. Environmentalism
These same liberals are also members of the Church of Global Warming of Modern Day Idiots* (MDI*) and insist on preserving the planet for future generations of humans to enjoy but at a cost to the human way of life. The argument of saving animal and plant species from extinction also goes against nature’s order. If these species are not strong enough to survive, why then should we alter nature’s plan by artificially preserving them?
If humans are only one of nature’s animal species then why must we be the only species on this planet that is forced to alter the way we live in order to preserve the planet and other species. Do you honestly think that lions are concerned with preserving any other species? Or how about whales? How many whales do you think would break for humans?
Being an environmentalist would keep me up nights unable to sleep because of internal conflict. The obvious hypocrisy would be too much for me to handle. But for today’s liberal, it doesn’t seem to be much of a problem. Unless of course they do recognize their hypocritical way of thinking and that is the source of their constipated attitudes.
Keep in mind of course that I don’t buy into the whole idea that humans are just another one of nature’s animal species. I am a man of GOD and believe that GOD created humans in His image to rule the earth and have dominion over plant and animal life. With this power GOD also humbles us with responsibility for these species. But we should not confuse this responsibility with an obligation to preserve the human race. But that is exactly what liberals do.
Evolution vs. Homosexuality
GOD commanded Adam and Eve to “go forth and multiply” but liberal America would have you believe that it is natural and normal for 2 men (or 2 women) to marry. How can these people “go forth and multiply” if these “relationships” are contrary to the natural order? 2 men cannot procreate and neither can 2 women. Those who believe that homosexuality is natural and normal somehow ignore nature’s rules for preserving the species. How would Darwin explain homosexuality in his theory of natural selection? One of the gods of liberal America is Darwin so I’m wondering if those advocating homosexuality as natural and normal believe that the human race is due to enter extinction? And if so, what can we do to thwart nature’s plan to eliminate our species? We seem to have the power to contradict nature’s plan for other species, why not our own?
Evolution vs. Socialism
America’s liberals are walking talking breathing bundles of confusion wrought with conflict and hypocrisy. Every word they utter, if analyzed, contradicts everything else they say. Their quest to end poverty through taxation is a futile effort to thwart nature’s plan and they know it. But for them to have power over other people they must make the people dependent upon them so they have created an economic trap for the poor.
Dependency societies never survive. The former Soviet Union was such a dependency society. People were dependent upon the state to dictate where they lived and worked. They depended upon the state to set price controls so that they could afford to purchase the every-day necessities to survive on the meager wages set by the state. The state also provided health care to the people.
These societies collapse because the economies can no longer support the massive dependency. The working class have no incentive to have quality or pride in their work because effort is not rewarded. Poor craftsmanship leads to poorly produced product which in turns leads to a anemic Gross Domestic Product. Poor GDP in turn leads to lower governmental revenue which in turn creates a problem when paying for the dependency.
America is falling into the trap that leads to the destruction of democracies.
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years.
Great nations rise and fall. The people go from bondage to spiritual truth, to great courage, from courage to liberty, from liberty to abundance, from abundance to selfishness, from selfishness to complacency, from complacency to apathy, from apathy to dependence, from dependence back again to bondage. - The source of this quote is disputed. Some say Alexander Tytler. The source of this quote is immaterial to the truth which it contains.
America is 232 years old and we have been voting for politicians who promise the most from the government treasure since FDR. So it can be said, that the downfall of this nation began with the Democrat Party and the expansion of the federal government created by The New Deal. Liberal fiscal policy has led to an ever expanding dependency class.
Poverty will always exist and there is no way of eradicating it. Wealth redistribution does nothing to improve the life of the poor but it does however make fewer people rich. Those that liberal America demonize - the evil rich people - are the same people who employ others. By increasing the tax burdens of the “rich” you in a sense eliminate investment capital which would have led to the creation of more employment opportunities for the poor. Those who have the power to employ others also have control over their incomes. They will naturally avoid paying as much in taxes as possible so they now have a disincentive to create more income.
When restrictions on earnings are eliminated or lowered, more capital is freed up for expansion and job creation. The working class becomes less dependent upon the government and in turn pay more in taxes. But liberals would rather tax those who create wealth in a fraudulent attempt at ending poverty which, as I stated above, cannot be done.
Liberal politicians constantly promise the moon when running for office and the poor in turn vote for them because of the false sense of ‘hope’ created by those who promise ‘change’. They promise dependency society programs to lure in the votes of those who have been lied to about who is truly responsible for their plight. Environmental controls and restrictions in this country have done more to eliminate jobs than any trade agreements. Knowing this, liberal politicians still get the uneducated and apathetic to vote for them.
What can you do?
You can educate yourself on the truth and refuse to allow the liberal misinformation machine control your life. Once you buy into their hypocrisy, you are theirs to control. They will hold on to your vote by appealing to your feelings and raising your anger. They will tell you tales of who to blame and you will fall for it because only they know how to correct your individual plight. But it is all a bunch of hogwash. Once your vote is cast and they assume the power that you have granted them, their aims become more important to them than whatever they’ve promised you.
If you need further convincing of what I have said about liberal hypocrisy, just look at Barack Hussein Obama’s contradictions in the past few months. His flip-flopping is proof positive that liberals are unprincipled and unwilling to stand by their word because their word is constantly changing depending on the mood of the country and which audience they are speaking before. Take a look at the questions asked by Rev. Rick Warren during the Saddleback Forum and see for yourself the disingenuousness of Barack Hussein Obama. Compare what he said last Saturday night with what he’s been saying for the past 16 months. Then ask yourself, is Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetero, worthy of your vote.
Sphere: Related Content![[del.icio.us]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Reddit]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/reddit.png)
![[Sphere]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/sphere.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Technorati]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/technorati.png)
![[Email]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)
