Home » Barack Hussein Obama »Democrat Corruption »Fiscal Responsibility »Libtards on Parade »Lunatic Lefties »News »Obama Fascism »Opinion »Presidential Politics »Stupidity »Taxes »The Economy »U.S. House »US Senate »socialism » Currently Reading:

The Democrat Lard Factory

January 28, 2009 Barack Hussein Obama, Democrat Corruption, Fiscal Responsibility, Libtards on Parade, Lunatic Lefties, News, Obama Fascism, Opinion, Presidential Politics, Stupidity, Taxes, The Economy, U.S. House, US Senate, socialism View Comments

Any time there is a perceived “crisis” in this country, those elected pinheads on “the hill” leap into action trying to figure out how to spend your money to fix it. Question is, should they? History says maybe not.

Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected at the hight of the Great Depression on a platform of economic recovery. His solution was a bigger more authoritative government. In the decades that have followed, history has proven that FDR’s “fixes” didn’t do anything but deepen the dependency of the American people on Uncle Sam. In the opinion of this blogger, Uncle Sam has been the pedophile in the family raping the innocent and making them believe that the raping is for their own good.

Now we have FDR revisited with POTUS Obama/Soetoro/Obama proposing much of the same type of programs that didn’t work for FDR. As Dr. Thomas Sowell said in his column yesterday, ‘What Are They Buying?‘…

Using long, drawn-out processes to put money into circulation to meet an emergency is like mailing a letter to the fire department to tell them that your house is on fire.

Does our crumbling infrastructure need to be improved? Hell YES it does. But to assume that because the intent is to create jobs by fixing the crumbling infrastructure doesn’t mean that it is actually going to happen. First off, infrastructure projects take time. Time that this economy does not have. Secondly it takes additional time to get approval from all of the agencies involved. The EPA and their unattainable demands and relentless court injunctions requires studies to be conducted called “environmental impact reports.” By the time these studies are conducted and approval for a new highway or bridge is complete, my daughter will be in college.

The point here is on paper this massively expensive infrastructure plan looks good. But in practice it has become another avenue for power hungry Congressional Democrats to bring home the bacon so to speak.

As I write this, debate is going on in Washington over this pork package or that. Everything from birth control to a museum for mobsters in Los Vegas has been on the table. Yesterday we found out that the birth control item has been tabled, much to Queen Pelosi’s dismay might I add, but the majority is still attempting to line the bill with more lard that you have to pay for.

The other argument for this package is that 95% of Americans will get a tax break. Well Thank You Very Much Mr. Obamaramadingdong.

Let’s discuss this tax break for a moment. 40%* of the population doesn’t have any tax liability anyway. The individuals who Obama wishes to exempt from his tax credits are the very people who provide employement opportunities for others. These people have the luxury of controlling their incomes. Think for a moment, if you had the opportunity to lessen your income as to keep your family below that upper 5% of income earners, wouldn’t you avoid the additional tax penalties? My friends this is called economic mobility and is the ultimate in freedom.

Instead of limiting income potential, why isn’t the Obama Infestation promoting the creation of wealth? Because he is a flaming socialist who was raised to believe that making everyone the same is somehow a greater goal. But what he wasn’t told in his indoctrination is that to accomplish this, you don’t raise those at the bottom, you lower those at the top. Those who have the ability to raise those from the bottom up are penalized for their ability to create wealth.

Economic stimulus? BS. Let’s call this what it is. A Democrat Lard Factory.

* In the interest of full disclosure, my family is in the above mentioned 40% that has no tax liability. Although we do not have any tax liability, we feel that those who do are already overburdened. The 5% that will be seeing no tax breaks or even a possible increase in taxes are the very people who have the ability to employ others. It seems counter-productive to inhibit that ability.

Bookmark and Share