tribe-jaw
tribe-jaw
tribe-jaw
tribe-jaw

Home » Election 2008 » Recent Articles:

How Safe Are We? Really?

Since the 2006 midterm elections, the leftist political hacks of the Democrat Party made it their goal to do whatever necessary to grab control of the nation from Republicans. This involved a massive campaign that actually began with the news media. It is no secret that the media has been in the pocket of the Democrats for decades. Objectivity went out the window when Walter Cronkite made his famous declaration that the war in Vietnam was lost in 1968.

The American public began to have their opinions about the Bush Administration altered by the news media in 2003 when the bodies of American soldiers who just captured the entire nation of Iraq began to come home. Once the war shifted from a military on military operation to an insurgency suppression mission, the bodies began to pile up and the American public’s stomach for war had turned. The news media began to beat a steady anti-war, anti-Bush drumbeat that culminated in Democrat victories in 2006 and 2008. Their only real battle cry to win popular support? We aren’t Bush.

Well they certainly aren’t Bush. Bush for all his faults did do something right. After we were attacked on September 11, 2001 he took the fight to the enemy. He picked the battlefield and our troops were the only Americans in harm’s way. Our honorable troops. The best trained and best equipped fighting force this planet has ever seen kept us safe at home by confronting the enemy on soil that he claims is his. And because of this, no successful attacks on US soil were able to be carried out.

Fast forward to 2008. Barack Hussein Obama ran on a platform of fancy rhetoric and platitudes that boiled down to one simple message. “I’m not Bush.” Due to the American public’s fatigue of the the Bush Administration largely due to the aforementioned drum beating of the liberal press that the Bush Administration didn’t seem to wish to counter, Barack Hussein Obama won the election and the Democrat Party gain a larger majority in both the House and Senate after having a 2-year majority where nothing got done.

The young new inexperience President decided that a naive apologetic approach was a way to subdue the world’s anti-American sentiment. He reach out with olive branch diplomacy* which only resulted in the President of Iran laughing at his gesture. Attacks against US interests abroad increased and the situation in Afghanistan worsened. Worst of all, 3 separate attacks have been either attempted or carried out on US soil in 2009 alone.

Say what you want about George W. Bush, but his policies did keep us safe for nearly 8 years. Those of us on the right have our own issues with Bush’s brand of social liberalism and fiscal irresponsibility but on terrorism, he knew what to do. The boy President (and aspiring Emperor of the World) hasn’t a clue. We see this when his Infestation makes statements that they later have to retract because he himself says, “we screwed up.”

Many are calling for heads to roll and to be honest, a few should. But not solely due to the failures of the past couple of weeks. Some of these characters are in positions that they are ill-equipped to handle. Including the President himself.

Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano is a complete and utter disaster as head of Homeland Security. Early in this Infestation she made declarations about the war on terrorism that a 5-year old child would call naive. The worst of which was re-naming terrorist attacks “man made disasters”. What?!? If anything is a “man made disaster” it is the Department of Homeland Security under this President and Janet Napolitano.

Another example of her incompetence is declaring that returning veterans and those who oppose the socialist agenda of this President to be domestic terrorists giving the illusion that if you oppose this socialist take over of our country you are worse than those who fly planes into skyscrapers. I’m sorry Janet, but that level of incompetence is what led to the death of an Army Recruiter in Little Rock, AR and the deaths of 13 people at Fr. Hood.

Should heads roll? Damn skippy! Let’s first start with Napolitano. How about Hillary Clinton? The State Department under her watch issued a visa to the panty bomber. How about Leon Penetta? The CIA under his watch failed to identify this guy. What about Michael Leiter who was skiing? If he must go so should Obama. After-all, Leiter didn’t do anything that the President wasn’t doing.

After the incident, Obama played 3 rounds of golf and didn’t say anything about it for 3 days. Talk about failure to perform the duties for which you were elected. Problem is, if Obama goes, we get stuck with that insanely ignorant Joe Biden. A man that couldn’t even win his own state’s primary. Do you think the people of Delaware know something about Big Mouth Joe?

So how safe are we? Under this President, we aren’t. We have in excess of 5,000 miles of largely unguarded boarder. The Infestation is more interested in monitoring Glenn Beck than Islamic Terrorists. Every time this Infestation makes explanations about what happened, they reveal more weaknesses in our system to our enemies.

Others that need to go…

Tim Geithner. How does a tax cheat get to become the head of the Fed in New York let alone Treasury Secretary?
Eric Holder. Anyone who would treat illegal enemy combatants as if they were defendants in a criminal proceeding is a fraud.

What about some in Congress?

Charlie Rangle. Again, how does a tax cheat end up writing tax law?
Christopher Dodd. Countrywide and connections with AIG not to mention an incident involving his best buddy Teddy Kennedy and a “waitress sandwich”? Should we wait for his retirement? He should be run out of the country on a rail.

I could go on but I’m approaching 1,000 words now. But I have 2 final questions before I go.

You should all ask yourselves…

Should heads roll? If so, whose and why?

The Communism of America

The increased politicization of American education has, in the Emperor’s words, “fundamentally transformed” American history. Gone are the days of teaching the reasons for the great migration to the new world. Instead, the Pilgrims and other settlers from Europe are painted as evil invaders who stole land from the native peoples and brought disease to the North American continent. The European settlers have been demonized as massive polluters who came to this pristine land with the goal of corrupting the planet.

The Pilgrims and Puritans weren’t escaping an increasingly oppressive government seeking a place where they could practice their religion free from the heavy hand of the King. Oh no. We can’t teach that. That victimizes the Pilgrims and the Puritans and not the ethnic group we wish to patronize for votes.

The American school house has become a den of indoctrination where extremely liberal teachers inject the lesson plans with more opinion than fact. This is the reason why we have school children singing songs to “Barack Hussein Obama Mmm Mmmm Mmmm” as if he were some sort of deity.

But where did it begin?

It began at the point where the teacher became a public employee deriving his/her salary from the taxpayer with no responsibility to produce a quality product. In this case that product is an educated child.

It began when it became increasingly difficult to terminate an under-performing educator who became nothing more than a glorified baby sitter instead of teaching facts, figures, and dates.

It began when we allowed the teacher’s explanation of life to overshadow the parents.

Parents have the primary responsibility of raising their children. No other occupation is as important as being a parent. But as a society we have abdicated our responsibilities to nature and our children by allowing others to frame the minds and spirits of our youth.

In 1963 a Congressman from Florida named Herlong read into the Congressional record of the House of Representatives a list of 45 goals of the Communist Party in the United States as outlined in the book “The Naked Communist,” by Cleon Skousen. Among these was #17…

Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

Well campers, they have control. Our schools are in fact transmission belts for socialism and the new Communist Propaganda. With videos like “The Story of Stuff” and “An Inconvenient Truth” being included in the curriculum that goal has been effectively achieved.

The propagandist nature of Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” has been well documented. The 9 inaccuracies have been publicly identified by a British court for the world to see. But “The Story of Stuff” slipped under the radar of most parents. Most didn’t even know it was being shown in their child’s classroom. The video was funded by the Tides Foundation. Tides is funded by the radical socialist George Soros but we aren’t supposed to question the motives of the left. But what if we did.

Adolf Hitler said,

He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.

Hitler, on this point, was correct. Once you poison the minds of the youth, through attrition you will gain the foothold that you need to control all others. That is what they are doing.

Back on point of the 45 goals of the Communist Party in the USA, #31 states…

Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

Isn’t that the real goal of showing propaganda films such as “An Inconvenient Truth” and “The Story of Stuff”?

To be fair, I don’t believe that most teachers are in fact attempting to “give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over” however there is an aspect of this that is correct. Teachers are teaching that Che Guavara was someone who is to be looked up to. Anita Dunn is addressing graduating classes telling them that the political figure she looks up to the most is Chairman Mao. This shouldn’t be a surprise to you. Between journalists, teachers, and college professors, enough people had their minds polluted about Barack Hussein Obama that this nation elected its first Communist President.

#21

Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

For America’s Communists 2 out of 3 ain’t bad apparently. Especially when you have news anchors who talk about thrills up their legs or bowing to their Imperial Sovereign. Movies they’ve had since the 60’s. Now they want radio and the internet.

#29

Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

The Emperor himself has stated that he thinks the Constitution is too restrictive. That it says what government cannot do but nothing about what it can do.

#26

Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

Hmmm, it seems to me that the Emperor just signed a defense appropriations bill which was adopted to fund the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that had an amendment in it that includes homosexuals in the hate crimes legislation. How it is possible to amend one piece of legislation through the adoption of another unrelated piece of legislation seems a bit off to me in the first place, but the goal was to get it through with no opposition.

I can go on and on about what this Infestation is doing and how public educators and journalists are helping it along. But you can read. Read it for yourself and think about each and every line. If you take an honest appraisal of the content of the goals see how they are being applied today, it will leave little doubt that the Communists have come to town and YOU allowed it to happen.

When you are finished with your reading assignment ask yourself one question…

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

Summary – Cheerleaders for the Revolution

The following is a summary of a report compiled by the Media Research Center.

Network Coverage of Barack Obama’s First 100 Days

During his first 100 days as President, Barack Obama has pushed an audaciously liberal agenda which, if enacted, would have radical consequences for America for decades. With Democrats enjoying monopoly control of the House and Senate, the news media have a professional duty to scrutinize those policies, and give audiences both sides of the story — not just the perspective of a powerful Chief Executive.

Unfortunately, a Media Research Center analysis of ABC, CBS and NBC evening news coverage of President Obama’s first 100 days in office shows network reporters have failed as watchdogs. The networks have raised few doubts about Obama’s left-wing agenda and showered each of Obama’s major policy initiatives with positive press.

MRC analysts looked at all 982 broadcast evening news stories about Obama and his administration from Inauguration Day (January 20) through April 29. Key findings:

  • Obama’s first 100 days were defined by massive spending, aggressive intervention in the private sector and proposals for a huge expansion of the federal government. Yet none of the networks aired a single story on whether Obama’s policies were pushing the U.S. toward socialism, and no reporter used the term “socialist” to describe Obama.
  • Not only that, network reporters never used the word “liberal” to describe either Barack Obama or his agenda during the first 100 days.
  • The networks lavished good press on every major initiative of the early Obama administration, including the massive stimulus package, all of the various bailouts, health care, stem cells, the environment and foreign policy.
  • In the days before the President unveiled his unprecedented $3.5 trillion budget — with a record-shattering $1.75 trillion deficit — four out of five statements on the evening newscasts parroted the White House spin that Obama was a deficit fighter.
  • Reporters treated Obama’s hugely expensive $787 billion stimulus bill to mainly positive coverage (58 percent positive, 42 percent negative).
  • The networks applauded Obama’s decision to use taxpayer money to fund embryo-destroying stem cell research (82% positive coverage).
  • Network coverage of Obama’s mortgage bailout was also positive — 59% of statements supported the bailout or wanted even more intervention, compared to 41% who opposed the bailout as unfair to responsible homeowners.
  • Reporters heavily skewed their coverage in favor of the President’s actions on global warming (78% positive).
  • President Obama’s decision to send thousands of additional troops to Afghanistan was greeted by nearly unanimous (91%) positive coverage — a far cry from the highly negative coverage of President Bush’s successful troop surge in Iraq two years ago.
  • Like Obama and the Democrats, the networks went on a feeding frenzy against big corporate bonuses. The networks aired six times more statements forwarding the “infuriated” reaction to business (104) than criticized politicians’ grandstanding (16).

The networks spent days decrying AIG’s $165 million bonuses, but hardly mentioned the $210 million in bonuses handed out by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the bailed-out mortgage giants with strong Democratic ties). ABC and NBC completely ignored the Fannie and Freddie bonuses, while the CBS Evening News gave it 27 seconds.

Such highly promotional coverage is not part of the normal “honeymoon” that exists between journalists and new Presidents. Rather, it seems to be a symptom of how few network reporters evidently see their professional role as operating on the public’s behalf as a check on whoever is in the White House.

The longstanding liberalism of network reporters made them aggressive adversaries of the Bush White House over the past eight years. The evidence from Barack Obama’s first 100 days is that that same liberal mindset has crippled reporters’ ability to be effective watchdogs on behalf of the public.

The once-fierce media watchdogs have become Barack Obama’s drooling, tail-wagging lapdogs. - Rich Noyes, Research Director for the MRC

The Media Research Center
325 South Patrick Street • Alexandria, Virginia, 22314
(703) 683-9733 • www.mediaresearch.org

The detailed report on PDF can be found HERE.

What?!? Obama Affirms Detainees in Afganistan Have No Constitutional Rights?!?

THE CHOSEN ONETHE MESSIAHTHE SAVIOR OF THE HUMAN RACE – the man who campaigned on being the anti-Bush is affirming a Bush Administration policy denying Constitutional rights to detainees being held at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. It seems the view from the other side of the fence is a lot clearer than the one he had from the cheap seats as the Junior Senator from Illinois. He now suddenly realizes that individuals sworn to destroy all things American including our Constitution being held outside the borders of our nation are not protected by our founding document. Why then close Gitmo?

In a related story posted on FoxNews.com, a report prepared by Adm. Patrick M. Walsh to POTUS Barry Obamaramadingdong concludes that detainees being held at the terrorist detention center Guantanamo Bay Cuba are being treated humanely. This is a stark contrast to the picture that candidate Obama painted of US treatment of these same terrorists at this same detention facility during the ‘08 campaign.

These two stories represent evidence that the American people have bought a bill of goods sold to them, not by the Obamassiah, but the media who hand picked Obama as their candidate. The media’s role in selling Gitmo as a den of torture led to public outcry that Obama then fed upon to draw votes. As I stated above, he is now in a position to see the truth and is in fact agreeing with Bush Administration policies governing these facilities.

Perhaps, we should transfer the campers at the Guantanamo Bay resort and recreation center to the detention facilities at Bagram Air Base. At least if we were to do that we know that Obamaramadingdong won’t try to apply the protections of our Constitution to individuals who are sworn to destroy it and everything it stands for.

Referenced Stories from FoxNews.com:

Obama Administration Affirms Bush Policy on Detainee Rights
Pentagon Report Concludes Guantanamo Detainees Treated Humanely

A Viable Solution to the Minnesota Senate Circus

February 6, 2009 Election 2008, News, Opinion, US Senate Comments Off

Just as I am apt to point out to foreign trolls who want to insert themselves into our national politics when they have no voice and no right, my suggestion is just that. I have no say in what happens in the Minnesota Senate race but I believe that I have a viable solution to the Circus that it has become.

A special election.

Because Minnesota officials have so obviously botched this election it seems obvious that the results of the November 4th election should be thrown out.

Yesterday, an attorney for Franken argued that a previously rejected absentee ballot should be counted because the voter submitted an affidavit stating that it was indeed his ballot. The ballot had been rejected because of a signature discrepancy. Colman’s attorneys then argued if this was going to be permitted, other previously rejected ballots that have accompanying affidavits should also be permitted. Franken’s attorney quickly recanted their motion.

I wonder why? Could it be that Franken knows that if he gets this one ballot counted increasing his lead to 226 votes, that it could backfire on him and he would ultimately lose the election? What happened to his “sincere” request that ALL ballots be counted?

Because both sides want certain ballots counted and others rejected, it seems to me that the only way to see what the will of the people of Minnesota is would be to hold a special election. Find out definitively today.

On the ballot November 4th were other candidates. Since, only these two candidates are in question, eliminate the other candidates and do a head to head runoff. Have the election monitored by, not Minnesotans, but elections officials from both parties from outside the state. People who don’t have a dog in the fight. Have the poll workers and ballot counters consisting of people who never had a vote in the election. Then and only then do I see an unbiased count happening.

It seems to me this is the only viable way to insure the true intent of the Minnesota voters is honored. Like I previously stated, I don’t have a voice in this election and my opinion is just that, my opinion. However, I offer it as a potential solution to what has become a circus filled with more clowns than Ringling Brothers.

Obama Mediocrity and Incompetence Will Doom the Obama Infestation

With less than a month before Barry Obama takes the oath of office, it has occurred to me to point out the consequences of electing this incredibly unqualified twit chief executive. The people elected Obama in guilt inspired fit of mass hysteria brought on by the liberal guilt machine which is also responsible for the asinine big brother style PC thought police that guilts people into censoring their speech. So much for the 1st Amendment that libtards like for you to believe they are trying to protect.

Before the 2004 Democrat National Convention Barack Hussein Obama was an unheard of (on a national scale) state Senator who had to that point in his career achieved very little. He was legislatively impotent preferring to take no position on anything other than the termination of human life and the neglect of children born alive following botched abortions. He has prided himself as a “community organizer” for whatever that job entails but as a “community organizer” he was just as impotent. He failed to achieve any of the goals he set out to accomplish. As a United States Senator he again, failed to achieve any notable success. In a sense, the 2008 Presidential election resulted in the most successful failure in US history being elected President of the United States.

Consequence #1 – What could we possibly expect from such an underachiever other than more failure?

Since the 2008 campaign launched itself shortly after Christmas 2006, Barack Hussein Obama has been riding a wave of popularity sparked by the proliferation of urban culture. The expansion of which has increased the rate of demoralization in America. White liberal guilt has permitted urban culture to blur the lines between acceptable and unacceptable behavior in this nation. How did it happen? Because white liberal guilt was permitted to become mainstream and as I discussed above – the PC police took control and it was no longer acceptable to question the expansion of this harmful behavior.

The imbeciles in the ghetto, who have traditionally been an unreliable voter base, registered by the millions because of the encouragement and sometimes illegal bribing from organizations such as ACORN. These voter registration efforts took place in largely black neighborhoods in urban areas and were largely successful because Barry is black. I hate to be the bearer of bad news to these simpletons from apathy central – but Barry has more in common with Georgie Soros than you. You bought a bill of goods that his election would empower you. News flash – nothing in your life is going to change.

How do I know this? I spend a lot of time in a largely black neighborhood in Cincinnati and have seen (post election) with my own eyes a sign that said “Yes We Did”. What exactly is that person expecting from the President-Elect? The moon. But there is no way on God’s green earth that Barry can deliver.

Since he was elected, America now has to tolerate people like Montel Williams appearing on television commercials in order to pimp coins with Barry’s likeness on them. Personally, I find these coins – and Montel Williams for that matter – tacky and repugnant.

Which leads me to consequence #2 – What is going to happen when the poor, apathetic African-American base who voted for Barry solely out of a sense of responsibility for getting the first black elected to the highest office in the land realizes that his election isn’t going to matter to them and they fail to support his re-election bid? Or for that matter, the re-election of those in Congress that Barry is going to rely upon to further his agenda? If they feel ignored the likelihood of their ever voting again is nil.

So I say congratulations Barry – for your sake I hope you are Superman and can make good on all your campaign promises. But wait, how could you when you promised different groups contradicting promises? You can’t.

It is impossible to be everything to everybody. But that is exactly what he was proclaimed to be. ‘The Chosen One’ ‘The Messiah’.

The truth is that Obama’s Presidency is doomed to failure before it begins. He can’t be everything to everybody so he isn’t going to even try. He got you to do his bidding and has 4 years to put forth an agenda which has not surfaced yet. His campaign rhetoric was just that, rhetoric. Empty promises that he never intended on honoring.

Obama has a hidden agenda – what that is, is anybody’s guess at this point. It could be that he doesn’t actually have one because he never believed that he would win. It’s possible, but I doubt it.

His mother and grandparents were avid socialists. He surrounded himself with these same kinds of people during his years as a student and “community organizer”. Why on earth would we now believe that he is anything but what he’s been groomed to be – a socialist. So could Marxism be his secret agenda? Possibly.

What I do know for sure is that he hasn’t a clue as to what the Presidency entails. Just as we don’t know exactly what a “community organizer” does. Since he is now privy to intelligence reports and military briefings, he has backed off his withdrawal plans. I wonder why? Could it be that it is much easier being an armchair quarterback than it is to suit up and take the hits?

I also know that there is a power struggle in the making within the Democrat Party and I doubt that sharing power with the Speaker of the House was in the President-elect’s plan.

In 2006 the American people gave the power of the purse to the Democrats and they squandered it. They had the power and did nothing with it. This inspired the people to further trust the Democrats with even more power – but that power will be for nothing as well.

I predict a widening recession maybe even full-out world wide depression brought upon by Democrat advocated regulations and bureaucracy. Obama’s solution? Roads and bridges. Sorry to inform the President-elect but roads and bridges are built by a core of companies who employ specialized personnel. On top of that, there is an asphalt shortage in this country. Unless the President-elect finds a new way to surface roads and bridges, those projects will do nothing to stimulate the economy.

The economy is just one of many issues that Obama will face in his first year as President. However, he is grossly underqualified to address these issues. He has spent years avoiding taking positions on anything but death. Death of the unborn and unwanted. Why should we believe that he has any clue about how to solve the problems that every-day people face every day? He can’t.

As I quoted below the banner of this page, Ann Coulter said it best when she said, “In the spirit of reaching across the aisle, we owe it to the Democrats to show their president the exact same kind of respect and loyalty that they have shown our recent Republican president.” It is my duty and that of every Conservative blogger to point out the political errors of the majority and be the political opposition in this country. Because if we fail we would surrender total power to liberals. And when that happens, this nation would become the USSA (Union of Socialist States of America).

Blagojevich, Obama, & Emanuel; Who Knew What And When?

A few days ago I wrote a piece speculating about who knew what and when in Rod “Where’s My Million” Blagojevich’s attempt to sell Sen. Obama’s seat. In that piece, I said,

Let’s not be too willing to accept Barry’s assertions that he had nothing to do with Blagojevich’s actions.

I cited a since deleted television news report from the day after the election where President-Elect (excuse me while I take a vomit break) – stated that he was scheduled to meet with Blagojevich that week. After the corrupt Governor was arrested last Tuesday, Barry stated emphatically that he hadn’t met with Blagojevich. My point was that the MSM is continuing their cover-up tactics in an attempt to shield the man who would be king from public scrutiny. Why not? They did it for 22 months and are responsible for his election.

Fact remains, that I believe the report that I saw. The report that has since been removed. I believe that Barry met with Blagojevich. I seriously doubt that Obama knew anything about Blagojevich’s plan to extort money out of the appointment.

THEN

After days of silence, incoming White House Chief of Staff, Rep. Rham Emanuel comes clean and states that he didn’t meet with Blagojevich himself about the appointment, but he did meet with the Governor’s staff.

What I want to know is – and I expect an answer soon – why a candidate who ran on a platform of returning transparency to the White House would dodge the question and mislead the public? Just think about all the smoke and mirrors employed during the campaign. Now combine that with this obvious untruth that neither Obama nor his staff spoke with the Governor?

Truth is, he did meet with the Governor. The Truth is, Emmanuel did meet with the Governor’s underlings. And the subject was Obama’s replacement. But like I’ve already stated, I doubt seriously that the President-Elect or his Chief of Staff would take part in a pay to play situation. – Are you taking notes Kevin the Chimp?

CPUSA’s Webb: A Springtime of Possibility

During the campaign I, as well as my colleagues on the right side of the blogosphere, warned you that the election of Barry O would usher in the United Socialist States of Amerika. Obama even confirmed this warning himself in his statements about income redistribution to “Joe the Plumber”. According to Communist Party Chief Sam Webb, we were right and Obama is going to make good on the only promise that he intends to keep.

From CPUSA:

“… in electing Barack Obama and larger Democratic Party majorities in Congress, the American people have taken the first and absolutely necessary step in the direction of building a more just society. We are not on the threshold of socialism for sure, but it is easy to see the further congealing of a growing majority that will realign politics, not incrementally and momentarily, but decisively and enduringly in the direction of economic justice, equality and peace.”

Webb isn’t saying that Socialism is a done deal with the election of Obama, however, I am saying it.

I said the day after the election that the electorate of this country disgusts me and I stand by that statement. Everyone who voted for that turd is responsible for the current free-fall of the Dow and the economic turmoil which we are about to enter.

I will admit, that the Bush Administration too is to blame for the downward slide in the economy. BUT, more importantly the American people. YOU had the opportunity to vote for policies that would allow the economy to recover and you chose to vote for socialism instead.

We warned you repeatedly about what an Obama Presidency would mean. It would mean Sam Webb’s wet dreams of an Amerikan Socialist State would become reality. Get ready for income redistribution because you voted for it.

SOCIALISM (according to Merriam-Webster):

1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

See Also – Barrack Hussein Obama

Obama’s statement to “Joe the Plumber” that he wants to “spread the wealth around” is in conforming to his Marxist upbringing. His grandparents moved about the country seeking communist thought and raised their daughter (Obama’s mother) as a communist. But yet, Barry O denies that he’s a Marxist/Socialist/Communist. How can that be?

From The Normative View of Marxian Theory on Income Distribution under Socialism:

The original Marxian view on distributive justice is very far from crude egalitarianism. Marx and Engels never argued for absolutely equal incomes of all people, although they did believe that the capitalist distribution of income is too unequal and unjust and must therefore be replaced by a new socialist or communist form of distribution. The best known reference for Marx’s own view on income distribution under socialism and communism can be found in his ‘Critique of the Gotha Program’. There he stated that under socialism, which he defined as a lower stage of communist society, people should be rewarded according to their work or contribution to society, while in the second stage or ‘full communism’ people should be rewarded according to their needs. Neither of these principles requires a full equality of incomes.

If it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, and smells like a duck, it’s a duck. If it looks like a Marxist, sounds like a Marxist… you get the picture.

Sam Webb has a lot to be hopeful about. His fantasies about a Communist Amerika are about to be put into motion thanks to the man with the middle name Hussein. His thoughts on the CPUSA’s contribution to making this happen?

From the CPUSA:

Our role, as I have tried to say, is to be part of the struggles going forward – beginning with attending the inauguration and encouraging others to do the same. It’s going to be a grand event and a public expression of support for Obama and a mass expression for change.

Let me finish by saying that it sure feels good to be on the winning side. I’m sure everyone feels the same way. At the same time, because of this historic victory, we – and the broader movement that we are a part of – have our work cut out for us in the coming years. It’s a big challenge, but we have met other challenges. So let’s go out there and do it with a sense of confidence that the best days for our country lay ahead of us. Yes we can! Si Se Puede! Thank you.

Translation – Perpetuate the vague ‘Change’ mantra when Obama has shown in recent days that the only ‘change’ that he represents is that he has an uncanny ability to ‘change’ his mind faster than a Broadway costume change.

“Yes We Can” in all of its linguistic forms is now the mantra of the huddled masses who refuse to better themselves and are relying on Obama to equal the playing field. What these incredibly moronic simpletons (like Webb) don’t realize is the fact that no one’s lives will be improved. All socialism and its big brother communism accomplishes is the degrading of the standard of living of those who currently live better. It makes rich people poor not the other way around.

You cannot improve the standard when you reward failure and punish success. The former Soviet Union became an economy wrought with apathy. Craftsmanship was unheard of and standards of living bottomed out. Why should I work harder if I’m going to receive no greater reward for the work? Income redistribution has a negative affect on everyone but knowledge of this fact hasn’t stopped the idiots who have been advocating a larger step toward socialism from advocating it since the New Deal.

So all of you “Yes We Can” idiots out there be prepared for economic hardship being redistributed. Instead of incomes being bettered from the top down, Obama promises mass poverty from the bottom up. The worst part of this sordid tale is the fact that it wasn’t forced upon us by some radical “revolutionary’ uprising. The electorate of this nation actually voted for it.

Mel Brooks produced 2 movies and a musical called ‘The Producers’ in which exists a fictional play called ‘Springtime for Hitler’. Well folks, prepare for ‘Springtime for Stalin Obama’.

Hat Tip: World Net Daily

Obama – Reagan Comparison? News-weak Writer Must Be Stealing from Barry’s Stash [UPDATED]

News-weak writer Eleanor Clift is making some rather far fetched comparisons about Barry Obama. Since the election, we’ve been treated to comparisons of ‘The Chosen One’ as being another JFK, FDR, and Lincoln (this one is a stretch as well), but Clift in some sort of narcotic induced hallucination actually is making the case that Barry O may be a new Reagan?!? This is the sort of fantasy that is produced only if the writer has been visiting the next President’s street grade pharmacist. The next thing you know Clift will be making a pilgrimage to Switzerland where voters just approved government controlled prescription heroine.

From News-weak:

Enough with the Lincoln analogies; Reagan is the president that Barack Obama is most closely modeling himself after. Ronald Reagan inherited stagflation, a defeat abroad and a nation at its nadir in morale. Through the sheer force of his personality as much as his policies, four years later, it was “Morning in America,” the theme of his 1984 re-election campaign when he won 49 states. Obama isn’t president yet, but his determined calm and orderly transition pace appear to be soothing the financial markets, producing the first sustained gain in stocks since the mid-September meltdown.

It is a good thing that Clift as-well-as the rest of Liberal-land don’t require facts before making statements in the here and now. History revision is the biggest tool of the trade for liberal Amerika. Forget about the huge losses since November 4th and concentrate on a single 5-day period.

From USA Today:

The Dow has rallied 17% during its current five-session win streak — its best five-session run since 1932. The rallies coincided with Obama-related news and public appearances where he introduced his economic dream team and sent a clear message that he’ll do whatever it takes to repair the economy.

That would be good news if it were to remain out of context. But if you place that 5-day period in context, you will notice a near 2000 point steady free-fall since the election before the rally which sparked the 5-day 17% gains.

The credit crisis is the source of the down-turn in the economy. A crisis which was sparked by the collapses of the housing market. A collapse which was in turn caused by a Carter era federal mandate on the housing market and lending institutions and largely ignored by the DemocRAT leadership. Not to mention fueled by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae from whom the future President took hundreds of thousands of dollars to ignore problems.

Liberals in the main stream media and on the net can live the Utopian fantasy that Obama is going to be the savior of all things secular but then there is the truth. He is about to destroy this country. Our only salvation is the structure under-which our government operates. Our only savior truly is the Constitution.

In 4 years we have the opportunity to send him back to Chicago which is on track to be the home of more non-domestic related homicides than a war zone.

Another Reagan, I don’t think so Ms. Clift. Perhaps you and Barry O had better lay off the “blow” and take an honest look at history. Ronald Reagan oversaw the longest sustained period of economic growth in American History. Barry O is likely to be another Jimmy Carter if anything. As-a-matter-of-fact I predict that the happiest person in America come November of 2012 will be Carter because he will no-longer be known as the worst President in American history.

Take a look at the long-term history of the dow before you believe anything that the Obama drunk MSM says about King Barry the Great.

The measly 5-day gains attributed to Barry in context.

Hat Tip: Newsbusters

UPDATE

On the day in which Barry O has made his nomination of Sen. Clinton to become his Sec. of State, the Dow Jones Industrial Averages plunge an additional 679.95 points, or 7.70%, to 8149.09, the S&P 500 slumped 80.03 points, or 8.93%, to 816.21 and the Nasdaq Composite fell 137.50 points, or 8.95%, to 1398.07. But according to the liberal media, Obama is the savior of the economy. Seems to me that with every new announcement from the man with the middle name Hussein, comes more dire news from Wall Street. Some savior.

Waiting for ‘Change’? Well Don’t Hold Your Breath

As Barry O continues to slowly select his inner circle, one thing is standing out more than any other – these people look awful familiar.

During his campaign we heard nothing resembling substance but rather a lot of undefined rhetoric about ‘Hope’ and ‘Change’. We assumed that he meant that he was going to ‘Change’ the face of Washington and how it does business. At least that is the assumption that those of us on the right have about those who fell for that steady load of male bovine excrement that he was dishing out in his protracted 21 months of speeches masquerading as a political campaign.

Instead of reaching into a pool of previously unknown individuals, Mr. Obama is resurrecting Clintonian Infestation zombies. From his Chief of Staff to his pick for Attorney General, the Obama Infestation is resembling the Clintonian era more by the day.

Barack Obama made “change” the mantra of his presidential campaign. But when it comes to appointees, his team doesn’t reflect much change from the Bill Clinton era.

Of the 47 appointees named so far to transition or staff posts, 31 have ties to the Clinton administration, including all but one member of the 12-person Transition Advisory Board.

Transition chief John Podesta served as Clinton’s chief of staff from 1998 to 2001.

Other Clinton-era appointees include former Deputy Secretary of Defense John White, former State Department official Wendy Sherman, and former deputies to National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, Defense Secretary William Perry, and Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Politico.com reports.

Also on the Obama team are transition adviser Michael Froman, who served as Rubin’s chief of staff, and Christopher Edley, who served Clinton and is married to a former Clinton deputy chief of staff.

Rep. Rahm Emanuel, a senior adviser to Clinton, has been named Obama’s chief of staff.

Obama is reportedly even considering Hillary Clinton for the Cabinet post of Secretary of State. SOURCE

emphasis mine

During the campaign those of us on the right were warning that election of undefined ‘Change’ would be dangerous. Now I’m afraid that the danger may lie within the masses who voted for Mr. Obama without knowing who and what he is.

Obama is so fearful of being tied to his socialist past that he refuses to dip into the pool of people that he truly wants to hold the posts that he’s currently making selections for. His true ambition is to select William Ayers for Sec. of Education but he can’t. He can’t because his past ties to Ayers have been exposed and he’s already on record denying them. He can’t because the American people have become reacquainted with Ayers, his radical socialist views, and is terrorist past. Remember – he who controls the youth has the future. It is Obama and Ayers who wish to pollute the minds of the youth in order to bring about an unachievable socialist utopia the empty promise of which has led to the downfall of dozens of countries and the deaths of hundreds of millions of people since the beginning of the Soviet experiment.

He can’t make the selection for Treasury that he truly wants because of socialist ambition. And the same could be said about State. In short, his plan has been foiled. His plan was to get elected without any light being shined on his true ambitions. His plan was to fool all of the people all of the time and he nearly accomplished that. This is the reason why he is reverting to Clintonian Infestation has-beens for his inner sanctum. He can’t have those he truly wants, so he’s selecting the failures of the past whom the ignorant public believes to be successes.

The recent Zogby poll that showed the ignorance of the average Obama voter this election cycle is a warning America. It is a warning that we can no longer be apathetic to the inner workings of Washington. We all must become political junkies and keep a watchful eye on the empty suits that we’ve allowed to be elected.

This same electorate actually believes that Barry O is capable of fulfilling his election promises because they are ignorant to the actual inner workings of our government. They haven’t a clue as to what is contained in the Constitution. The separation of powers is foreign to them and believe that it is the President who “rules” from the oval office.

The results of the 2008 election is a warning. A warning about the increasingly biased reporting of the leftist press and their unwillingness to expose the truth about leftist politicians. The election is a warning about the ignorance of the electorate and a need to educate the masses about who they are voting for before they vote. It is a crime that only 2% of Obama voters could answer Zogby’s polling questions 100% correctly. And one must wonder, if that 2% knew all this about the candidates before they voted, why is it they still voted for Obama? They must be part of the greater conspiracy to resurrect and institute the ambitions of the Communist Party in America.

Search This Site:

National Debt

Learn more about us debt.

Ohio Under Uncle Ted

Anti-Obama Art




Image Courtesy of Young Gun Conservative




Categories

STACLU BlogBurst

Featured Content:

How Safe Are We? Really?

January 10, 2010

Since the 2006 midterm elections, the leftist political hacks of the Democrat Party made it their goal to do whatever necessary to grab control of the nation from Republicans. This involved a massive campaign that actually began with the news media. It is no secret that the media has been in the pocket of the [...]

The Communism of America

November 3, 2009

The increased politicization of American education has, in the Emperor’s words, “fundamentally transformed” American history. Gone are the days of teaching the reasons for the great migration to the new world. Instead, the Pilgrims and other settlers from Europe are painted as evil invaders who stole land from the native peoples and brought disease to [...]

Summary – Cheerleaders for the Revolution

May 14, 2009

The following is a summary of a report compiled by the Media Research Center.

Network Coverage of Barack Obama’s First 100 Days
During his first 100 days as President, Barack Obama has pushed an audaciously liberal agenda which, if enacted, would have radical consequences for America for decades. With Democrats enjoying monopoly control of the House and [...]

What?!? Obama Affirms Detainees in Afganistan Have No Constitutional Rights?!?

February 21, 2009

THE CHOSEN ONE – THE MESSIAH – THE SAVIOR OF THE HUMAN RACE – the man who campaigned on being the anti-Bush is affirming a Bush Administration policy denying Constitutional rights to detainees being held at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. It seems the view from the other side of the fence is a lot [...]

A Viable Solution to the Minnesota Senate Circus

February 6, 2009

Just as I am apt to point out to foreign trolls who want to insert themselves into our national politics when they have no voice and no right, my suggestion is just that. I have no say in what happens in the Minnesota Senate race but I believe that I have a viable solution to [...]

Obama Mediocrity and Incompetence Will Doom the Obama Infestation

December 29, 2008

With less than a month before Barry Obama takes the oath of office, it has occurred to me to point out the consequences of electing this incredibly unqualified twit chief executive. The people elected Obama in guilt inspired fit of mass hysteria brought on by the liberal guilt machine which is also responsible for the [...]

Blagojevich, Obama, & Emanuel; Who Knew What And When?

December 15, 2008

A few days ago I wrote a piece speculating about who knew what and when in Rod “Where’s My Million” Blagojevich’s attempt to sell Sen. Obama’s seat. In that piece, I said,
Let’s not be too willing to accept Barry’s assertions that he had nothing to do with Blagojevich’s actions.
I cited a since deleted television news [...]

CPUSA’s Webb: A Springtime of Possibility

December 2, 2008

During the campaign I, as well as my colleagues on the right side of the blogosphere, warned you that the election of Barry O would usher in the United Socialist States of Amerika. Obama even confirmed this warning himself in his statements about income redistribution to “Joe the Plumber”. According to Communist Party Chief Sam [...]

Obama – Reagan Comparison? News-weak Writer Must Be Stealing from Barry’s Stash [UPDATED]

December 1, 2008

News-weak writer Eleanor Clift is making some rather far fetched comparisons about Barry Obama. Since the election, we’ve been treated to comparisons of ‘The Chosen One’ as being another JFK, FDR, and Lincoln (this one is a stretch as well), but Clift in some sort of narcotic induced hallucination actually is making the case that [...]

Waiting for ‘Change’? Well Don’t Hold Your Breath

November 20, 2008

As Barry O continues to slowly select his inner circle, one thing is standing out more than any other – these people look awful familiar.
During his campaign we heard nothing resembling substance but rather a lot of undefined rhetoric about ‘Hope’ and ‘Change’. We assumed that he meant that he was going to ‘Change’ the [...]

Charities



The Spina Bifida Association of Cincinnati



Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center


Recent Posts

Archive Calendar

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Misc. Graphics






Img Courtesy of Big Dog



Recent Comments:

  • Gribbit: In the interest of full disclosure - Igormarxo's link is to his own site. It is a satire site. Funny stuff....
  • Igormarxo: Obama qualifications to reform health care:No birth certificateCannot stop smokingDifficulty telling the truth.Narciss...
  • halthouse1: We have national debt that may be in jeopardy of losing its sacrosanct triple A rating, homeland security that is being tested every day, a real unemp...
  • GM Roper: Snickerface... heh, what a handle. I wonder if it means he/she is chuckling, or more likely let the snickers get all over his/her puss. At any rat...
  • Gribbit: From GM Roper...Snickerface... heh, what a handle. I wonder if it means he/she is chuckling, or more likely let the snickers get all over his...
Content Protected Using Blog Protector By: PcDrome.