The 2010 Census – What Fun It Is! (Sarcasm)
It was a bit of a to do on the cable news channels today. “The 2010 Census Forms Hit the Mail Today”. Yes – they did, as-a-matter-of-fact ours found its way into our mailbox today. For all the worrying about the invasive questioning that was rumored to be on this form – well that was right.
The first invasive (in my opinion) question is #4 and every question following #4.
“What is your telephone number? We may call if we don’t understand an answer.
My opposition to this question begins with the premise. First off, this is a form where there is no ability for an answer to be ambiguous. They are already on the form. Check this box or that box. Fill in Names and Dates (which I’ll get into later) by putting one letter in each box. How can they NOT understand an answer to such questions? Therefore, question #4 is moot.
Question #5 begins the fun questions.
5. Please provide information for each person living here. Start with a person living here who owns or rents this house, apartment, or mobile. home. If the owner or renter lives somewhere else, start with any adult living here. This will be Person 1.
What is Person 1’s Name? Print name below.
Last Name [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
First Name [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ] MI [ ]
6.What is Person 1’s sex? Mark [x] ONE box.
[ ] Male [ ] Female
My question is, how does the transgendered person answer question #6? I mean, this President and his Infestation seems to be infatuated with those of, shall we say, questionable lifestyles. So how does one of these “people” answer this question? It does say…
Mark [x] ONE box.
Moving on…
7. What is Person 1’s age and what is Person 1’s date of birth?
Please report babies as age 0 when the child is less than 1 year old.
—————————–Print numbers in boxes.
Age on April1, 2010———-Month—-Day——-Year of birth
[ ][ ][ ]———————[ ][ ]—–[ ] [ ]—–[ ][ ][ ][ ]
Note: You will notice that the editing software does not allow for accurate representation of the form. I did consider scanning the form into a file, then cutting the particular questions out of the file as a photo then inserting them. But chose to type the questions out instead.
Continuing…
==> Note: Please answer BOTH Question 8 about Hispanic origin and Question 9 about race. For this census, Hispanic origins are not races.
How quaint. But I also notice that there is no question regarding legal status included in with Questions #8 and #9.
8. Is Person 1 of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin?
[ ] No, not of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin
[ ] Yes, Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano
[ ] Yes, Puerto Rican
[ ] Yes, Cuban
[ ] Yes, another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin — Print origin, for example, Argentinean, Columbian, Dominican, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran, Spaniard, and so on.
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
If they are not attempting to establish actual country of origin of every person occupying a home in the United States, why then are they even asking? And since they are asking, why are they limiting this question to “Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin” if there is not a predetermined motive? Should we not know if a person is an immigrant from say – Russia, France, Germany, or China?
There is something nefarious going on with this President, his Infestation, and this Congress as it relates to this census. If it weren’t, why is “No” bolded?
9. What is person 1’s race? Mark [x] one or more boxes.
[ ] White
[ ] Black, African Am., Negro
[ ] American Indian or Alaska Native — Print name of enrolled tribe.
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
(note these will not appear as they do on the form but the information is EXACTLY the same)
#9 Continued…
[ ] Asian Indian [ ] Japanese [ ] Native Hawaiian
[ ] Chinese [ ] Korean [ ] Guamanian or Chamorro
[ ] Filipino [ ] Vietnamese [ ] Samoan
[ ] Other Asian – Print race. [ ] Other Pacific Islander – Print race.
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ] Some other race – Print Race
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
I’m considering marking [X] Some other race and printing in [H][U][M][A][N] and letting them figure that one out without providing a telephone number.
I didn’t know it was a requirement to own a telephone in this country for Big Bro Obama to check in on me.
But I digress…
Back to this invasive form…
10. Does Person 1 sometimes live or stay somewhere else?
[ ] No [ ] Yes – Mark [X] all that apply.[ ] In College Housing [ ] For child custody
[ ] In the military [ ] In jail or prison
[ ] At a seasonal or second residence [ ] For another reason
Now, at the top of the form they have instructions that make Question #10 moot. They say…
Before you answer Question 1, count the people living in this house, apartment, or mobile home using our guidelines.
- Count all people, including babies, who live and sleep here most of the time.
The Census Bureau also conducts counts in institutions and other places, so:
- Do not count anyone living away either at college or in the Armed Forces.
- Do not count anyone in a nursing home, jail, prison, detention facility, etc., on April 1, 2010.
- Leave these people off your form, even if they will return to live here after they leave college, the nursing home, the military, jail, etc. Otherwise, they may be counted twice.
The Census must also include people without a permanent place to stay, so:
- If someone who has no permanent place to stay is staying here on April 1, 2010, count that person. Otherwise, he or she may be missed in the census.
If we are not to include people who are say… in jail, prison, and I love how they included people in nursing homes in this descriptions, then why did they include question 10 to begin with? It is my belief that they WANT to count certain people twice. Groups of people which would tend to vote for the Socialist Democrat Party in particular come to mind. It is a process called gerrymandering.
The US Constitution in Article I Section 2 clearly states…
The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.
But it makes not mention of recording the names, ages, and ethnic backgrounds of the subjects to be enumerated. It especially doesn’t mention singling out a particular ethnic group. Doing so in the course of this census makes it appear that this Congress and this President have something special in mind to use this data for. I do not trust them Sam I am…
On my form, the question of phone number will not be answered as-well-as any additional BS question that I find offensive and invasive (which is the bulk of them). I suggest you do the same.
I can just see it now, 310 million members of the HUMAN race instead of their asinine racial questions. Come to think of it, the mere idea of their asking is offensive and racist. Chew on that one Barry.
NOTE: After question #10, the form repeats itself for Persons 2- 6 with questions 5-10 numbered as questions 1-7. Then a reduce number of questions which only includes, last name, first name, middle initial, sex, age on April 1, 2010, date of birth, and whether or not they are related to Person 1. This is for additional residents up to Person 12! Who besides illegals treat residential homes like an Army barracks?

![[del.icio.us]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Reddit]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/reddit.png)
![[Sphere]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/sphere.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Technorati]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/technorati.png)
![[Twitter]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)
![[Email]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)
Several news agencies are reporting that Pakistani forces captured one of America’s Ten Most Wanted in Karachi. Gadahn was captured along with 2 other high ranking al Qaeda officers and a Pakistani government official by Pakistani Intelligence Agents.





