As SanFranNan and her stooge Steny “If I only had a brain” Hoyer wax poetic in USA Today about the brown-shirt tactics of Death Care opponents, Obama’s chief union supporters travel by bus to “town hall” meetings with one goal in mind, quash dissent even if it means they have to crush some skulls.
Clothed in purple t-shirts, isn’t it interesting how autocratic minded people always have to dress alike, members of the SEIU take their places in all of these town halls often entering through different doors and carrying professionally printed signage. In some locals, they are actually the security of the event pushing the opposition through doors and closing them in order to keep those who question the Gestapo tactics of the White House, Pelosi, Hoyer, and their pals at the SEIU out of the debate.
Obama, Pelosi and Co. all have a singular message. Sit down, shut up, and you are going to get this “reform” in spite of your opposition because “we THINK it’s good for you.” But yet, those protesting are Nazi’s carrying swastikas – right Nan?
Truth be told, I’ve never seen this much oppression in my nearly 40 years of life. Not in this country anyway. I will admit that the stories out of the former Soviet Union during much of my life resemble what we are seeing unfold in Washington. What I’ve read about the rise of Nazism in 1930’s Germany strongly resembles the tactics of the Party in power.
For all the left’s bitching about George W. Bush and their attempts to paint him as a modern day Hitler, George never once attempted to enlist ordinary citizens to rat out other citizens so that he could compile an enemies list. But Barry has.
The war of words originating from the left is a battle of diversion. A poor one I’ll admit but they can’t sell the plan so they must attack those who oppose it. They just can’t allow it to die a quiet death, which, if they were smart and no one is accusing any of them of being smart, would be the thing to do. Then they could revive aspects of the legislation in other bills and get most of what they want stealthily. The Infestation is so entrenched in this scheme that it must stand its ground. Most of the legislation passed already contains framework for this legislation. If it fails, the already passed provisions would be exposed and seen for what it is. A massive power grab by liberals.
Little did most of us know that the Porkulus package actually contained funding to build the network on which to store all of your medical records. Without the Death Care bill, this network has no purpose. Big Brah* will be exposed and everyone would finally know what he looks like.
Welcome to Orwellian 1984. He was only 25 years premature but otherwise disturbingly accurate.
… When Describing Anyone on the American Right Even Though the Terms Better Describe Themselves – A Historical Look at Political Terminology & Ideology.
It never ceases to amaze me about how insanely ignorant commenters from the left are when they throw the “N” bomb or the “F” bomb around in reference to those of us on the right side of the political sphere. I’m not referring to the “N” bomb as a derogatory term used in reference to African-Americans or the “F” bomb as the offensive word prominent in the American lexicon that some use as a Smurf would use the word “smurf”. Rather the American Leftists use of the terms Nazi (the “N” bomb) and Fascist (the “F” bomb) when referencing any of us on the Right.
I credit the left’s ignorance of the terms to the failure of a public school education perpetuated by a myth that Nazis and Fascists were from the right side of their respective national political spheres. In fact, the opposite is actually true.
The left’s fascination with using the terms have nothing to do with the actual ideologies involved. Their motivation for using the terms is to scare the apolitical among the populous into not associating themselves with true right-wing thought.
When discussing the differences between the two political ideologies, it is important that we understand where the terms “right-wing” and “left-wing” originate.
The phrase “right-wing” comes from the seating arrangement of parliamentary partisans during the French Revolution. The monarchists who supported the Ancien Régime were commonly referred to as rightists because they sat on the right side of successive legislative assemblies. SOURCE
Just as those loyal to the monarchy during the French Revolution were seated on the right side of the assembly, today Republicans in the US House and Senate are seated – guess where- on the right side of their respective chambers.
In the 20th century, outside the United States, where capitalism was always supported by the vast majority of politicians and intellectuals, the most notable distinction between left and right was in economic policy. The right defended capitalism, whereas the left advocated socialism (often democratic socialism) or communism. SOURCE
In the United States, the right is a term associated with Conservatives and to a lesser degree the Republican Party (GOP). The left is a term associated with Liberalism and to an accurate degree the Democrat Party because the prominent political ideology within the DNC is liberalism.
As for the terms “Fascist” or “Nazi” as thrown by leftist bomb throwers such as the moron who sent my friend Jay from Stop the ACLU via email…
WARNING THIS EMAIL CONTAINS OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE…
because the sender obviously hasn’t a clue on how to make a valid argument and must resort to climbing in the gutter to be heard.
From: Dr. Erasmus Doorjammer drerasmusdoorjammer@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, May 3, 2009 at 1:23 PM
Subject: unless your braindead listen up
To: jay@stoptheaclu.com
it seems that anti american facist nazi loving scum like you seem to thrive on your ignorance and inbreeding .We the true patriots of this country Have spoken .WE ELECTED A REAL MAN TO OFFICE NOT SOME FACIST AS YOU ALL SEEM TO LIKE TO VOTE FOR. IF YOU WANT CIVIL WAR BRING IT ON ,WE ARE READY , IF YOU WANT FIGHTS IN THE STREET ,BRING IT ON, WE ARE READY, WE ARE SICK AND TIRED OF THE FACIST NAZI SCUMBAGS LIKE YOURSELF, WHO HATE AMERICA ,FLY THE CONFEDERATE FLAG ( I JUST WIPED MY ASS ON THAT FLAG YOU SOUTHERN IDIOTS) AND SUPPORT THE FACIST RIGHT WING SCOTUS JUDGES ,THEY ARE DOOMED, WE WILL FIGHT WE WILL GET LOUD AND WE CONTINUE TO FIGHT FOR OUR CONSTITUTION AND STEP ON ANTI AMERICAN FACIST BOOTHEEL LICKING NAZI SCUM LIKE YOU, NOW PACK YOUR BAGS AND GET THE F OUT OF COUNTRY BEFORE WE KICK YOU OUT
This individual obviously has no idea what “Nazis” or “Fascists” stood for or he/she could not possibly believe the crap that they spew. I won’t get into their lack of punctuation, sentence structure, or any other indications of a lack of education. Mine isn’t great, but that email is appalling.
We’ll begin with “Fascism” -
As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism. SOURCE
I’m sorry, but I don’t recall anyone that I associate with politically EVER advocating the principles outlined in the above paragraph. But, in order to give “Dr. Erasmus Doorjammer” the benefit of doubt until we fully explore what “Fascism” truly is, I’ll continue with the definition of the term and ideology.
Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.) Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace. Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions. SOUCE
Hmmm. Seems that these principles are being advocated by a certain elected official and a certain political Party within the United States right now. I’m sorry – but… Ah yes. That would be President Barry O and his fellow Democrats. NOT as “Dr. Erasmus Doorjammer” from the email would suggest, Republicans or Conservatives.
If a formal architect of fascism can be identified, it is Benito Mussolini, the onetime Marxist editor who, caught up in nationalist fervor, broke with the left as World War I approached and became Italy’s leader in 1922. Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:
“The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill.”
Before his foray into imperialism in 1935, Mussolini was often praised by prominent Americans and Britons, including Winston Churchill, for his economic program.
Similarly, Adolf Hitler, whose National Socialist (Nazi) Party adapted fascism to Germany beginning in 1933, said:
“The state should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. The Third Reich will always retain its right to control the owners of property.”
Both nations exhibited elaborate planning schemes for their economies in order to carry out the state’s objectives. Mussolini’s corporate state “consider[ed] private initiative in production the most effective instrument to protect national interests”. But the meaning of “initiative” differed significantly from its meaning in a market economy. Labor and management were organized into twenty-two industry and trade “corporations,” each with Fascist Party members as senior participants. The corporations were consolidated into a National Council of Corporations; however, the real decisions were made by state agencies such as the Instituto per la Ricosstruzione Industriale, which held shares in industrial, agricultural, and real estate enterprises, and the Instituto Mobiliare, which controlled the nation’s credit.
Hitler’s regime eliminated small corporations and made membership in cartels mandatory. The Reich Economic Chamber was at the top of a complicated bureaucracy comprising nearly two hundred organizations organized along industry, commercial, and craft lines, as well as several national councils. The Labor Front, an extension of the Nazi Party, directed all labor matters, including wages and assignment of workers to particular jobs. Labor conscription was inaugurated in 1938. Two years earlier, Hitler had imposed a four-year plan to shift the nation’s economy to a war footing. In Europe during this era, Spain, Portugal, and Greece also instituted fascist economies.
In the United States, beginning in 1933, the constellation of government interventions known as the New Deal had features suggestive of the corporate state. The National Industrial Recovery Act created code authorities and codes of practice that governed all aspects of manufacturing and commerce. The National Labor Relations Act made the federal government the final arbiter in labor issues. The Agricultural Adjustment Act introduced central planning to farming. The object was to reduce competition and output in order to keep prices and incomes of particular groups from falling during the Great Depression.
It is a matter of controversy whether President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal was directly influenced by fascist economic policies. Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.” Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator. SOURCE- emphasis mine
So it seems that the term “Fascists” clearly does not apply to anyone on the American Right. In actuality, it better describes a revered American liberal Democrat in what he did and planned to do. Let us not forget that Roosevelt attempted to consolidate additional power in his attempt to stack the Supreme Court with additional members appointed by himself of course that would grant him more power. This is something being advocated by liberals now.
As for the term Nazi – let us not lose sight of the fact that Nazis were members of the German National Socialist Party. The only thing that the modern liberal can use as justification for calling those of us on the right who oppose their socialist goals is that Hitler and his Nazi Party opposed full out Soviet Communism. So, by calling us Nazis for opposing your socialist goals for this country, is that in a sense an admission of guilt? Are you trying to install Soviet style Communism right here in the US? We’ve long suspected it anyway so you may as well admit it without the inaccurate name calling.
Obama is attempting to control industry now. He wants to trade the government’s preferred stock that it acquired as a result of the bailouts to common stock giving the government voting power and in a sense control of private companies. And the ability to put pro-Obama individuals in positions of control in those companies. Be careful of politicians who nationalize.
And don’t even get me started on the “Yes We Can” chants. Seems awful similar to “Zeig Heil” to me.
President Juggears attempted to shift blame for the escalating federal budget deficit onto his predecessor…
Obama -
“Number one, we inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit…. That wasn’t me. Number two, there is almost uniform consensus among economists that in the middle of the biggest crisis, financial crisis, since the Great Depression, we had to take extraordinary steps. So you’ve got a lot of Republican economists who agree that we had to do a stimulus package and we had to do something about the banks. Those are one-time charges, and they’re big, and they’ll make our deficits go up over the next two years.
However, the normally liberal friendly Associated Press isn’t buying it. In an unusual confirmation of just exactly how the federal government is defined by the United States Constitution, the AP reminds us…
Congress controls the purse strings, not the president, and it was under Democratic control for Obama’s last two years as Illinois senator. Obama supported the emergency bailout package in President George W. Bush’s final months – a package Democratic leaders wanted to make bigger.
To be sure, Obama opposed the Iraq war, a drain on federal coffers for six years before he became president. But with one major exception, he voted in support of Iraq war spending.
The AP even goes further confirming Republican and Conservative reminders that President Obamaramadingdong is actually making the economy worse with his “fix” for our nation’s financial woes.
The economy has worsened under Obama, though from forces surely in play before he became president, and he can credibly claim to have inherited a grim situation.
Still, his response to the crisis goes well beyond “one-time charges.”
He’s persuaded Congress to expand children’s health insurance, education spending, health information technology and more. He’s moving ahead on a variety of big-ticket items on health care, the environment, energy and transportation that, if achieved, will be more enduring than bank bailouts and aid for homeowners.
The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated his policy proposals would add a net $428 billion to the deficit over four years, even accounting for his spending reduction goals. Now, the deficit is nearly quadrupling to $1.75 trillion. – emphasis mine
For all the excuses that the AP makes for the man with the middle name Hussein in their article, they also are pointing out his disconnection with the truth. Which is in fact something that we on the right have been telling you since before YOU voted for him. YOU, the American voter, are responsible for what is happening with our country. YOU, allowed Barry the Wonder Turd to become POTUS in spite of questions that have gone unanswered to this day. YOU elected him without knowing who he is. And YOU buried your head in the sand when he began to show his colors before the election writing off verbal mistakes which gave us glimpses into his intent.
YOU, whether YOU voted for Barry the Wonder Turd or not, are equally guilty as those who did because YOU didn’t do enough to prevent his election. YOU, allowed him to get away with avoiding substantive debate and taking his eloquent speeches on face value.
By failing to demand answers to the questions about his place of birth and his associations with known domestic terrorists, racist pastors, and known Communists, YOU have failed the American people past, present, and future.
My conscience is clear. I did my part. I voted against him and wrote about him. I asked the questions to which I am still demanding answers to. Where were YOU?
I find it incredibly disconcerting that the AP – the liberal propagandists that they are – are doing more to counter Obamaramadingdong’s pretty speeches attempting to absolve himself of all culpability than YOU are. It is time to act. It’s actually past time to act but the time for burying your head in the sand is OVER.
With the defection of Arlen Spector to the Democrat Party the Senate Majority Leader has the super majority required to bypass the Will of the People. It is now more imperative than ever to take away that majority.
1/3 of the Senate is up for re-election next year. We need to either reduce that majority to make it possible for the Republicans to block harmful legislation (no matter how well intentioned) or regain the majority in the Senate. Every single House seat is up and it is possible – no matter how improbable – to regain the majority there as well.
We also need State Houses. For example – Ohio.
Commie Ted Strickland is up for re-election in 2010. If not for the corrupt way in which his predecessor governed, he would NOT have that office now. Ken Blackwell would. But that wasn’t in the cards thanks to Bob Taft. But Ohioans have a shot in 2010. If someone like John Kasich can be persuaded to run, he would be elected by the Buckeye State.
It is YOUR job to find qualified candidates in YOUR state to throw these Commie Bums OUT OF OFFICE. So get up off YOUR [three letter term for Democrats] and get it done.
News-weak writer Eleanor Clift is making some rather far fetched comparisons about Barry Obama. Since the election, we’ve been treated to comparisons of ‘The Chosen One’ as being another JFK, FDR, and Lincoln (this one is a stretch as well), but Clift in some sort of narcotic induced hallucination actually is making the case that Barry O may be a new Reagan?!? This is the sort of fantasy that is produced only if the writer has been visiting the next President’s street grade pharmacist. The next thing you know Clift will be making a pilgrimage to Switzerland where voters just approved government controlled prescription heroine.
Enough with the Lincoln analogies; Reagan is the president that Barack Obama is most closely modeling himself after. Ronald Reagan inherited stagflation, a defeat abroad and a nation at its nadir in morale. Through the sheer force of his personality as much as his policies, four years later, it was “Morning in America,” the theme of his 1984 re-election campaign when he won 49 states. Obama isn’t president yet, but his determined calm and orderly transition pace appear to be soothing the financial markets, producing the first sustained gain in stocks since the mid-September meltdown.
It is a good thing that Clift as-well-as the rest of Liberal-land don’t require facts before making statements in the here and now. History revision is the biggest tool of the trade for liberal Amerika. Forget about the huge losses since November 4th and concentrate on a single 5-day period.
The Dow has rallied 17% during its current five-session win streak — its best five-session run since 1932. The rallies coincided with Obama-related news and public appearances where he introduced his economic dream team and sent a clear message that he’ll do whatever it takes to repair the economy.
That would be good news if it were to remain out of context. But if you place that 5-day period in context, you will notice a near 2000 point steady free-fall since the election before the rally which sparked the 5-day 17% gains.
The credit crisis is the source of the down-turn in the economy. A crisis which was sparked by the collapses of the housing market. A collapse which was in turn caused by a Carter era federal mandate on the housing market and lending institutions and largely ignored by the DemocRAT leadership. Not to mention fueled by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae from whom the future President took hundreds of thousands of dollars to ignore problems.
Liberals in the main stream media and on the net can live the Utopian fantasy that Obama is going to be the savior of all things secular but then there is the truth. He is about to destroy this country. Our only salvation is the structure under-which our government operates. Our only savior truly is the Constitution.
In 4 years we have the opportunity to send him back to Chicago which is on track to be the home of more non-domestic related homicides than a war zone.
Another Reagan, I don’t think so Ms. Clift. Perhaps you and Barry O had better lay off the “blow” and take an honest look at history. Ronald Reagan oversaw the longest sustained period of economic growth in American History. Barry O is likely to be another Jimmy Carter if anything. As-a-matter-of-fact I predict that the happiest person in America come November of 2012 will be Carter because he will no-longer be known as the worst President in American history.
Take a look at the long-term history of the dow before you believe anything that the Obama drunk MSM says about King Barry the Great.
The measly 5-day gains attributed to Barry in context.
On the day in which Barry O has made his nomination of Sen. Clinton to become his Sec. of State, the Dow Jones Industrial Averages plunge an additional 679.95 points, or 7.70%, to 8149.09, the S&P 500 slumped 80.03 points, or 8.93%, to 816.21 and the Nasdaq Composite fell 137.50 points, or 8.95%, to 1398.07. But according to the liberal media, Obama is the savior of the economy. Seems to me that with every new announcement from the man with the middle name Hussein, comes more dire news from Wall Street. Some savior.
First it was $700B in the hands of one person. Henry Paulson is the first person in the history of this nation to have sole control over that much of this nation’s money. But Congress isn’t done. Talk on the hill is that they are considering anywhere between $300 – $500B more in stimulus. WHAT? WHERE DO THESE MORONS THINK THIS MONEY IS COMING FROM!!!
Since they are determined to spend money that we don’t have, are they at least going to spend it in a way that would actually stimulate the economy? Nope.
Talk on the hill is that they want to put this money into infrastructure. They want to build roads and bridges with the money in hopes that it would put people to work. Problem – only those who work in road construction will get work. Judging by the amount of road construction taking place in Ohio I can say with some level of certainty that those people aren’t in danger of losing their jobs.
$500B in new spending on roads and bridges will do nothing to stimulate this economy. If the proponents of stimulus wish to truly stimulate the economy… give the money back to the taxpayers. Or do an income redistribution and give it to everyone. This asinine idea of putting the money into road projects won’t do anything to stimulate a bowl movement let alone this economy. It’s not like I’m in favor of socialist income redistribution, but at least that would release the money back out into the private sector and get it out of the hands of the bureaucrats and into the hands of people that would actually use it to stimulate the economy.
Coming into the holiday season (See also Christmas) investors on Wall Street are fearful of a sluggish retail season. A $500B boost to the retail sector would do more to stimulate the economy than a road project that wouldn’t get started for at least 12 months that would rely on asphalt that is in short supply.
Congress…
If you are bound and determined to spend this money, do so in a way that would actually help the economy. Then again, Democrats don’t exactly have a track record of having a grasp on the economy. The last Democrat President that did anything that actually helped the economy was John F. Kennedy.
Now I understand that there are some libtarded history revisionists who will point to the balanced budgets and budget surplus under Clinton as a success story. Problem – Presidents don’t pass budgets. Every President proposes a balanced budget. It is Congress that throws it out of balance.
The balanced budgets and budget surplus of the late 1990s are the result of fiscally responsible Republican Congress who chose not to overspend.
Now that idea went the way of the do-do in the 2000s when Republicans began to act like Democrats but truth be told, it was a Republican Congress that was responsible for that surplus and those balanced budgets not Democrats.
This nation has a habit of crediting and demonizing Presidents for actions that they have no actual control over. The reason? Most of this nation hasn’t a clue as to how this country actually works. People believe in fantasy provisions in the Constitution like abortion and ignore the actual balance of power contained in its text. The apathetic nature of the electorate is how we end up with an empty suit as President Elect. We are now finding out more about this twit than we heard about during the campaigns. We finally know that he proposes to raise a private army answerable to him directly and mandate that middle school, high school, and college students participate in hours of “community service”. Sounds to me as if he wants to create an Obama Youth in the model of Adolf Hitler.
But hey America, you voted for it. Count me in with the 57,000,000 who didn’t.
As SanFranNan and her stooge Steny “If I only had a brain” Hoyer wax poetic in USA Today about the brown-shirt tactics of Death Care opponents, Obama’s chief union supporters travel by bus to “town hall” meetings with one goal in mind, quash dissent even if it means they have to crush some skulls.
Clothed in [...]
… When Describing Anyone on the American Right Even Though the Terms Better Describe Themselves – A Historical Look at Political Terminology & Ideology.
It never ceases to amaze me about how insanely ignorant commenters from the left are when they throw the “N” bomb or the “F” bomb around in reference to those of us [...]
President Juggears attempted to shift blame for the escalating federal budget deficit onto his predecessor…
Obama -
“Number one, we inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit…. That wasn’t me. Number two, there is almost uniform consensus among economists that in the middle of the biggest crisis, financial crisis, since the Great Depression, we had to take extraordinary [...]
News-weak writer Eleanor Clift is making some rather far fetched comparisons about Barry Obama. Since the election, we’ve been treated to comparisons of ‘The Chosen One’ as being another JFK, FDR, and Lincoln (this one is a stretch as well), but Clift in some sort of narcotic induced hallucination actually is making the case that [...]
First it was $700B in the hands of one person. Henry Paulson is the first person in the history of this nation to have sole control over that much of this nation’s money. But Congress isn’t done. Talk on the hill is that they are considering anywhere between $300 – $500B more in stimulus. WHAT? [...]
Gribbit: In the interest of full disclosure - Igormarxo's link is to his own site. It is a satire site. Funny stuff....
Igormarxo: Obama qualifications to reform health care:No birth certificateCannot stop smokingDifficulty telling the truth.Narciss...
halthouse1: We have national debt that may be in jeopardy of losing its sacrosanct triple A rating, homeland security that is being tested every day, a real unemp...
GM Roper: Snickerface... heh, what a handle. I wonder if it means he/she is chuckling, or more likely let the snickers get all over his/her puss.
At any rat...
Gribbit: From GM Roper...Snickerface... heh, what a handle. I wonder if it means he/she is chuckling, or more likely let the snickers get all over his...
As SanFranNan and her stooge Steny “If I only had a brain” Hoyer wax poetic in USA Today about the brown-shirt tactics of Death Care opponents, Obama’s chief union supporters travel by bus to “town hall” meetings with one goal in mind, quash dissent even if it means they have to crush some skulls.
![[del.icio.us]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Reddit]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/reddit.png)
![[Sphere]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/sphere.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Technorati]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/technorati.png)
![[Twitter]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)
![[Email]](http://gribbitonline.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)
It never ceases to amaze me about how insanely ignorant commenters from the left are when they throw the “N” bomb or the “F” bomb around in reference to those of us on the right side of the political sphere. I’m not referring to the “N” bomb as a derogatory term used in reference to African-Americans or the “F” bomb as the offensive word prominent in the American lexicon that some use as a Smurf would use the word “smurf”. Rather the American Leftists use of the terms Nazi (the “N” bomb) and Fascist (the “F” bomb) when referencing any of us on the Right.
