… It Seems That He’s Closing Dealerships That Contribute To GOP Candidates
In a story that appeared on Michelle Malkin, Hot Air, and reported on by Michelle on Fox and Friends, it seems that an overwhelming number of GOP backing Chrysler dealers are getting their franchises closed thanks to the Man with the Middle Name Hussein.
Where is the Main Stream Media on this? Absent as usual.
Last week I named Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano ‘Public Enemy #1′ because of her efforts to stymie political dissent in this country by naming people like me to a list of ‘potential’ domestic terrorists.
.
She considers anyone who…
Opposes abortion
Opposes same-sex marriage
Opposes restrictions on firearms
Opposes lax immigration laws
Opposes the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship, and the expansion of social programs
Opposes continuation of free trade agreements
Are suspect of foreign regimes
Fears Communist regimes
Opposes a “one world” government
Bemoans the decline of U.S. stature in the world
Is upset with loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and India, and more
… to be a ‘right-wing extremist’ and capable of violent acts against her beloved government, its socialist leader, and those who support him and her.
I’m proud to say that I’m pro-life. – This automatically puts me on her list.
I’m proud to say that I oppose same sex marriage. – Calling the coupling of individuals of the same sex marriage cheapens the sanctity of the union I share with my wife. It lessens our bond with one another. Sexual coupling in a manner which cannot result in the procreation of children is a mortal sin and calling that coupling marriage legitimizes that mortal sin in society. So Janet can call me a domestic terrorist all she wants, but I refuse to alter my thinking because she finds it offensive. I find her and her homo buddies offensive.
I oppose any restrictions on the ownership of firearms in this country. – I do so because I swore an oath one time in my life to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign or domestic. Those who have wet-dreams at the prospect of removing guns from our society do so as enemies of the Constitution. The Second Amendment is clear. It along with the rest of our founding document is clear and needs no “interpretation” because it is written in English. “… the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. ” What about the words, “shall not be infringed” do these simple minded morons not understand?
Too many people in this country get hung up on the introductory statement of fact that a well maintained militia is necessary. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,…”. This is nothing more than a statement of fact. The Second Amendment was also meant to empower the people in the event that the politicians reverted back to an authoritarian state. Janet sees this as a threat because she and her boss are in fact reverting back to an authoritarian state.
I am proud to say that I oppose lax immigration laws. – I am all for legal immigration. To say otherwise is a deception. What I oppose is the free flow of individuals who are not citizens of this nation to cross our borders in clear violation of the law. To do so once is a misdemeanor. To do so a second time ( or more) is a felony. Anyone who claims these people are law abiding need to consult the immigration laws of this nation. Their mere presence in this nation is a violation of law so those who claim that these people are not criminals are twisting the truth.
It is my belief that any elected official, or individual employed by any of the 50 state governments or the federal government, who fails to enforce the existing immigration laws of this nation is guilty of dereliction of duty and should themselves be arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced as if they aided the individuals who violate our laws directly. This includes the President of the United States and the Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano. And if this belief warrants my being labeled a right-wing extremist and a domestic terrorist – I’m fine with that too.
I oppose POTUS Barry Obamaramadingdong and all of his policies because he and his policies are dangerous for our people. He is a moron. His ideas are outdated socialist tripe which have failed each and every time they have been tried before.
Einstein said it best when he described insanity. “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” The Russians did it – failed. The Chinese did it – nearly starved to death. The North Koreans did it – they are still starving. Cuba – same deal. Our forefathers in the United States even tried it and nearly starved to death the first winter. Why on earth would anyone believe that because Obamaramadingdong is the self-proclaimed “chosen one” would his socialist goals for this nation actually work this time? To do so would be in Einstein’s words, “insane”.
I’m on the fence about free-trade agreements. In some cases they are good for the nation. In others, not so good. But if even if I unilaterally opposed every trade agreement I would be in good company; or at least in liberal eyes I would. You see labor unions oppose free trade agreements as well.
It is my belief that the United States needs a trade policy that reciprocates the trade policies of our trade partners. If a partner levies a 10% tariff on our goods, we levy a 10% teriff on theirs. If a partner places our goods in quarantine for a period which makes those goods unsellable, we should do the same to their goods. Free trade can only be free if the rules are the same in both directions.
If this makes me a “right-wing extremist” than it also makes the UAW and other big unions “right-wing extremists” as well. Perhaps a letter to the bosses of these unions explaining this to them would go a long way to secure their support for Obamaramadingdong in 2012.
I am suspect of all foreign governments. Even our allies. Each nation is only going to look out for the best interests of their citizens. That is of course excluding our own who is more interested in protecting the rights of foreigners who are sworn enemies of our country and are pledged to destroy it or die trying.
I oppose Communism in all its forms. Which automatically puts me on this list because Obamaramadingdong himself has a goal of creating the United Socialist States of Amerika. A nation made in the Soviet model which his mommy, daddy, grampy, grammy, and his adopted uncle (Frank Marshall Davis) worshiped.
I oppose any effort to make the United States subservient to a “world government”. I especially oppose it if it is to be run by the Useless Nations. An organization which I believe should be evicted from our soil. It is my belief that we should relocate the UN 50 miles east of its current location and withdraw from the organization.
I have a problem with an organization which derives 25% of its funding from our taxpayers then has the audacity to attempt to tell us that we owe them more money and how to run our country. As far as I’m concerned, it should go the way of the League of Nations. And if that puts me on Janet’s hit list, so be it.
The decline of the US in stature of this world is a product of the expansion of socialism at the hands of people like Obamaramadingdong. In other countries I couldn’t give a flying fig what they think. But to deride the United States from within is treason in my opinion and should be punishable by death. I won’t hold by breath waiting for Obama’s confession (or Janet’s for that matter).
I am upset with the loss of manufacturing jobs in this nation for multiple reasons. The unemployment rate being the first and quality of the goods sold in this nation is another. Our workers produce the best goods available in the world. Losing these jobs hurts this nation in every conceivable way. Price isn’t always everything. However, it is a myth to suggest that it is wages or free trade agreements driving these jobs offshore. The true culprit is taxes.
If believing what I believe makes me an enemy of the state, good. I don’t like Obama or his Secretary of Homeland Security. It is my opinion, which is protected by the First Amendment, that they are destroying this nation. They are wasting their time compiling lists of “right-wing extremists” in preparation of some sort of Naziesque or Stalinesque purge while real terrorists plot the destruction of our nation. They sit in Washington looking for ways to get political revenge and are ignoring real threats. For this, they are showing their inability to govern.
As the nation sinks deeper into this recession and our national debt continues to double, triple, or quadruple while the Man with the Middle Name Hussein infests 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W., the true enemies of this nation are plotting. And we are all less safe with him “in charge”.
One last thought…
Remember Orwell’s warning in ‘1984‘. Big Brother is here and her name is Janet.
There is a lot of back-biting that goes on in the blogosphere. I for one know this first hand as I have a couple of other so-called bloggers who attack me on a regular basis. Kevin the Chimp, Meat for Brains, pay some attention to this story. You too Insane Dan aka Republican Vet – thought I forgot about your psychotic arse didn’t you.
A former Vogue model named Liskula Cohen is suing Google because of a few tasteless posts on a site called Skanks in NYC. She is suing to get the name of the anonymous blogger who authors the blog hosted on Blogger.com as well as the commenters. Cohen doesn’t know it but if her suit is successful, it will stifle free speech on the net.
I’m not going to go so far as to claim that this is a deliberate effort by Cohen to effect free speech, she is merely attempting to protect her reputation. A reputation that is seemingly tainted might I add.
As I’ve said, my beef isn’t with her, it is with what she is doing. However, one must convince a jury in a libel suit that a reasonable man (or woman) must be convinced that what has been printed about them is true when it is not. Problem for Cohen is I’m not convinced that it isn’t true.
Someone took those photos of her acting in the manner that she did. Someone took them and leaked them. What is being said about her on the blog may or may not be true with the exception of her age. The site claims that she’s 40 when her actual age is 36. If that is the only inaccuracy that she has to prove that the site is libelous, she has an uphill battle.
Perhaps Ms. Cohen should research the libel suit against Larry Flint brought on by Jerry Falwell before she goes forward. Flint’s magazine ‘Hustler’ had a rather tasteless pseudo-advertisement for Compari which portrayed Falwell as having a sexual relationship with his own mother. Falwell lost his suit against Flint and his magazine because it could not be assumed that a reasonable man could be made believe that Mr. Falwell would have a sexual relationship with his mother by the ad. In a sense, the ad was so outrageously out of character for Mr. Falwell, that no reasonable person could believe it.
The court found that the free speech guaranties of the First Amendment prohibit public figures, such as Jerry Falwell, from recovering from the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress by publishing a caricature, as was in the ad parodies in Hustler magazine. In order to recover from the tort, it must be shown that the ad which contained the false statement was made with actual malice, or with knowledge that the statement was false, or with reckless disregard as to whether it was true.
There was no assertion of fact in the ad parodies and no reasonable person could believe them to be true. Additionally, malice was not proven by the respondent. Therefore, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s decision, citing the First Amendment free speech guaranties and the rule of law that public figures cannot recover from the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress unless malice is proven.
Let’s keep in mind that Ms. Cohen has appeared in Vogue and other publications therefore she IS a public figure. So is anyone who publishes a blog, either in their own name or through the use of a pseudonym, reporters, authors, televisions personalities, politicians, musicians, actors, etc… It’s all fair game folks.
Now, if Ms. Cohen has a propensity for doing any of the things claimed in the blog that she is suing over, it cannot be assumed that any person could be reasonably be convinced that it isn’t true. There are photos of her acting in a tasteless manner. The author of the blog points this out. The author of the blog also has some sort of personal vendetta against Ms. Cohen the source of which doesn’t matter.
What does matter is the precedent that forcing Google to reveal who the author is would set. As of now, the web is a free forum for anyone to speak about anything they want to speak about. Should Ms. Cohen prevail in her quest, people may become afraid to speak their minds out of fear of legal ramifications from some offended twit.
Ms. Cohen acts a little loose and she has been called out by this blogger for acting in this manner. Perhaps Ms. Cohen should analyze her actions before attacking the messenger. That said however, should Ms. Cohen prevail in her quest, perhaps Kevin the Chimp and Meat for Brains should consider hiring themselves legal counsel.
As for anyone considering actions against me – make sure you read the footer before going through the expense of putting an attorney on retainer. All the material printed on this blog is for the express purpose of political commentary. Anything said, written, or otherwise placed in the public domain is fair game. And if you were to take the time to look at every post, you will notice that it is filed under ‘opinion’ and that is something that everyone is entitled to and free to express. Or so says the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Ms. Cohen, I’m sorry that someone thinks so little of you as to print such material about you on a blog. However, if the material is in the public sphere it is next to impossible to remove it. You cannot put the toothpaste back into the proverbial tube. Your trying will only harm others unconnected with this incident and will do nothing to improve your reputation. As-a-matter-of-fact, by bringing attention to it, you will be placing yourself under increased public scrutiny – so why go through with it?
… It Seems That He’s Closing Dealerships That Contribute To GOP Candidates
In a story that appeared on Michelle Malkin, Hot Air, and reported on by Michelle on Fox and Friends, it seems that an overwhelming number of GOP backing Chrysler dealers are getting their franchises closed thanks to the Man with the Middle Name Hussein.
Last week I named Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano ‘Public Enemy #1′ because of her efforts to stymie political dissent in this country by naming people like me to a list of ‘potential’ domestic terrorists.
.
She considers anyone who…
Opposes abortion
Opposes same-sex marriage
Opposes restrictions on firearms
Opposes lax immigration laws
Opposes the policies of President Obama regarding [...]
H/T: The Drudge Report
There is a lot of back-biting that goes on in the blogosphere. I for one know this first hand as I have a couple of other so-called bloggers who attack me on a regular basis. Kevin the Chimp, Meat for Brains, pay some attention to this story. You too Insane Dan aka [...]
Gribbit: In the interest of full disclosure - Igormarxo's link is to his own site. It is a satire site. Funny stuff....
Igormarxo: Obama qualifications to reform health care:No birth certificateCannot stop smokingDifficulty telling the truth.Narciss...
halthouse1: We have national debt that may be in jeopardy of losing its sacrosanct triple A rating, homeland security that is being tested every day, a real unemp...
GM Roper: Snickerface... heh, what a handle. I wonder if it means he/she is chuckling, or more likely let the snickers get all over his/her puss.
At any rat...
Gribbit: From GM Roper...Snickerface... heh, what a handle. I wonder if it means he/she is chuckling, or more likely let the snickers get all over his...